(SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. (1943) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638.) ( Cal. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) In its finding the Supreme Court stated, in relevant part, [t]his analysis [by the Court of Appeal] necessarily implies that the same factual predicate can give rise to two independent obligations to exercise due care according to two different standards. ) ) ) In state-court civil litigation cases filed in San Francisco County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 ) 96, llc atique rehman sarahann shapiro joseph k. bravo plaintiff's motion for summary judgment tentative ruling: parties to appear posted: 3:00 pm (See Barris v. County of Los Angeles (1999) 20 Cal.4th 101.) 11 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Most of the petitions for writs of administrative mandamus filed against State of California licensing agencies are heard in Sacramento County Superior Court. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Aside from the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit, it fails to specify the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. H. Eleventh Cause of Action - Punitive Damages. The Court finds that a total of three hours across two motions at the reasonable rate of $495/hr is appropriate, plus $60 of filing fees per motion are all reasonable. 6 EMMA L GONZALEZ, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396370 Sacramento County Superior Court Prerogative Writ Departments. When an arbitration occurs in only one county, that county is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Strategic discovery abuses are not a proper basis for mandatory relief. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Accordingly, the demur to the third cause of action is OVERRULED. Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. 9 JOSE A MARTINEZ, ) Department: 403 Reputation. 9 NICA DAWN DESTEFANO, ) Department: 404 ) CRC 3.1304(c) and (d) (amended eff 1/1/16) > > Read More.. NEW RULE AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE APRIL 1 . Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. 6 Defendants counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355494 ) 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STEP UP VISITATION TO OVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. ) Palay v. Sup.Ct. ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 IVAN D DAVCHEV, ) Department: 403 The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Tentative Rulings for Civil and Family Law matters. Respondents counsel shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). Notice will be provided to the parties by the Court upon reassignment with the new hearing dates. (415) 551-5910, Court Supervisor - Office Staff 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Court Clerk ) ) 11 ) ) The page number may be suppressed and need not appear on the first page. (1987) 194 Cal..App.3d 1023, 1027 (judgment amended to add defendant corporations alter ego, in control of the litigation, as additional judgment debtor on ground that omission was misnomer). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) The motion is largely, and fatally, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. Ellis v. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.(2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878. Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 6 JIAWEI TAN, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795548 Valley Bank of Nevada, supra, 15 Cal.3d 658. Unscheduled motions will not be heard. 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. ), (e) Application to file longer memorandum. ) ) 5 (Ferraro v. Camarlinghi (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Law & Motion Judge - January 2, 2018 to December 31, 2018 Family Law Judge - September 19, 2014 to December 31, 2017. . 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Failure to verify responses is equivalent to serving no responses at all. "A person desiring to appear as counsel pro hac vice in a superior court must file with the court a verified application together with proof of service by mail.". 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 9 CRYSTAL HOUSTON SIEGLER, ) Department: 404 5:26.). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Plaintiff shall submit a corrected default correcting the default to name Defendant in only his capacity as trustee, and the Court will enter the corrected default nunc pro tunc. ) 6 ANTHONY SHUMSKAS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793239 It is clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions. 5 ) 9 JIAYING HE, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Application for this relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be granted, and shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken.. Untimely responses to discovery requests waive all objections. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The receivers portion of the name refers to a legal proceeding where the Superior Court takes control of property and assets in certain disputes. A memorandum that exceeds the page limits of these rules must be filed and considered in the same manner as a late-filed paper. Upon the hearing of the motion the court shall, if it appears that the action or proceeding was not commenced in the proper court, order the action or proceeding transferred to the proper court.. ) 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department: 403 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT CourtCall is not permitted for this calendar. 11 ) Sacramento County Superior Court has four courtrooms that handle petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, Department 24, Department 29, Department 31 and Department 42. ) Therefore, the demur to the ninth cause of action is OVERRULED. ) Where no response was served to a RPOD, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to show good cause for the production requested. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Huh v. Wang(2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. See CCP 437. Civic Center Courthouse 13 TENTATIVE RULING (6th Ed.2021, March 2022 Update) Judgment 67-73; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. Lebowitz Dec. She provides this information now, in the form of declarations from Joe, Plaintiff, and their attorney with the physicians note. UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. He alleges that this has resulted in permanent injuries. The court decides these applications without a hearing. Department 425 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Except in a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 15 pages. ) 5 Paralegal Manual, San Francisco Probate Court, Self-Represented Guardianship Program (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County . (MP&A pp. Results. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Guide Civ. (CCP) 435. 9 SEAN CHARLSON, ) Department: 403 11 ) The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. ) ) 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) File the original motion and proof of service with the court. A complaint is sufficient as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory, despite the label for a cause of action in the complaint. ) ) Hours: Monday - Friday: 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. ) ) Plaintiff complains that he has suffered permanent injuries because of Defendants negligent or intentional failure to diagnose and treat him properly when he sought medical care at Defendant Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH) on April 6, 2020. ) ) Based on the foregoing, the Motion is GRANTED. ) 11 ) Ct. (1982) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) Ex Parte Motion Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Notice. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The demur is therefore SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to the second and sixth causes of action. There is a fee for the ex parte hearing payable at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Please note that law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Despite further warning signs and the fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge him without doing more. 6 JESSE H KONIUK, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794578 ) The court should consider 1) the purpose of the information sought; 2) the effect that disclosure will have on the parties and the trial; 3) the nature of the objections to disclosure; 4) whether the court may make an alternative order granting partial disclosure, disclosure in another form, or disclosure only if the party seeking the information undertakes certain appropriate burdens. A Practice Limited to Licenses and Regulatory Law. Proc. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM CCP . The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. Print | E-mail Civil and Family Law Tentative Rulings Please refer to the notice entitled "Information Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Operations" on the court's home page for further detailed information. The Court heard the matter on May 4, 2022, and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling. Generally, a courts power to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the judgment was clerical. CCP section 473(d); 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 ) 11 ) ) 5 Department Hours and Locations Presiding Judge 720 9th Street, 6 th Floor 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Law and Motion Department 53 813 6 th Street, 2 nd Floor PLEASE NOTE:In accordance with the Order of the Presiding Judge, a party or representative of a party may appear in Department 19 in person or remotely by Zoom, a web conferencing platform. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) 6 REBECCA REBECCA SKINNER, ) Case Number: FDI-06-762767 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (Subd (g) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004.). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Los Angeles County Superior Court Writs and Receivers. Service to the other party or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in person. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Plaintiff and SFPKOA met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the responses. ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 7 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) ) ) Clinic, Inc. v. Sup.Ct. ) ) 6 NEHA DUA BREJA, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795427 ) ) ) ) Petitioner was aware of the existence of this case as early as July 29, 2021, and very likely before, as it was a petition to compel the arbitration at issue here. CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). ) Unscheduled motions will not be heard. 9 PETER AVRITCH, ) Department: 404 Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Sixty (60) Days After Commencement of the Action > > Read More.. > > Read More.. Scheduling Summary Judgment Motion > > Read More.. Scheduling the Hearing. ) ) ) ) Notice to the opposing party must be provided by 10:00 a.m. the day before the ex parte hearing. After submission of the order, the Court will sign the Amended Judgment. Room 402 (415) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m. Monday - Friday (excluding Court holidays), 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Family Law Facilitator/Family Law Self-Help Center, California Courts Self-Help/Divorce or Separation. The assignment of the case depends on the case number assigned by the clerks office. Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90. District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Family Law handles domestic relations cases including dissolutions, separations, nullity, domestic violence prevention, paternity actions, child custody, child support, visitation arrangements, spousal support, family support and adoptions. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STATUS OF CHILD'S THERA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Plaintiff filed a motion for OSC re Contempt and Sanctions on January 14, 2022, alleging in part that no supplemental responses had been served in violation of the Courts September 3, 2021 order. ) SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). Jury clerks are also available by phone at (415) 444-7120, between the hours of 1:00 to 3:00 PM and by email at jury@marincourt.org. 11 ) Code Civ. Finally, as Plaintiff and Joe argue, Joe is not a party to this litigation and has not himself put his own medical condition at issue. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Plaintiff shall inform the preparing counsel of objections as to form, if any, or whether the form of order is approved, within five days of receipt of the proposed order. Id., 4-5. 9 MAINAK BANERJEE, ) Department: 403 9 RACHEL M KONIUK, ) Department: 403 ) Plaintiffs request for sanctions is GRANTED. ) The page limit does not include the caption page, the notice of motion and motion, exhibits, declarations, attachments, the table of contents, the table of authorities, or the proof of service. ) 9 LUCY GUEVARA, ) Department: 403 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 12 REVIEW HEARING ON ISSUES OF CUSTOD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) As such, it is not adequately noticed, and is not considered. 6 JULIE ANN ALBAY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387354 Motion to Strike is denied. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. Quick Links This matter was continued for the parties to meet and confer. 5 The Court held that the Plaintiffs had failed "to show a likelihood of prevailing on their claims." Department 404 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Department rules are available here. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; ORDER TO SHOW CAU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Request for Entry of Default (1)(c). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) ) Therefore, Plaintiffs request for $1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. The memorandum must contain a statement of facts, a concise statement of the law, evidence and arguments relied on, and a discussion of the statutes, cases, and textbooks cited in support of the position advanced. ) Severe emotional distress [is] emotional distress of such substantial quantity or enduring quality that no reasonable man in a civilized society should be expected to endure it. (Fletcher v. Western Life Insurance Co. (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397; see alsoCACI 1600.). 2 ) ) 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 An ex parte hearing is urgent and is requested by one party with short notice to the opposing party. ) ) 6 JANE KAWASAKI, ) Case Number: FDI-14-782099 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER BIFURCATION FOR STATUS ONLY D 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Strategic discovery misconduct resulting in terminating sanctions is not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473(b). 5 ) 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF CHILD SUPPORT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT OF CLER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Although some have a specific court department for hearing petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, in many courts these cases can be assigned to any judge. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Exchange(2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144. ) 11 ) Ct. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 211, 214 (motion to strike lies against request for punitive damages when the claim sued upon would not support an award of punitive damages as a matter of law). (Civil Case Coordination) 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. The matter went unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2021. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Before Trial Ch. Court Clerk 5 Attorneys will NOT advise clients on the laws of any State or any State law legal matters (with the exception of California). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 DARIA DOGALAKOVA, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815634 5 5 ) SRMH shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The opposition and the reply both merit consideration. ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 6 CASIERRA MICHAUX, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794605 A noticed motion is when the opposing party was given advance notice of the hearing. ) ), Demurrer for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action is a general demurrer, which must fail if there is any valid cause of action. (See CCP 430.10(e).) 100 ) San Francisco, CA 94102 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 511 Ex Parte Schedule:Monday through Thursday at 9:15 a.m. 9 ANTHONY SINGER, ) Department: 404 11 ) As with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) (650) 261-5122. The court DENIES the motion. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 11 ) 12 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Z; REQUEST FOR ORDER R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (CCP 430.41(a)(3).) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) 11 ) Code 3294. Blumenthal v. Superior Court(1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) (415) 551-3744, Judge Roger C. Chan ) ) ) CCP 396b(a), 397(a). Insight. 7. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 1.2 and United States Code 5 U.S.C. The previous tentative ruling was as follows: Motion to Compel Production of Medical Records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED. ) If in paper form, the copy must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 9 MAINAK BANERJEE, ) Department: 403 Department 403 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ), The elements the cause of action for a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress are: (1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the Plaintiff's suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and proximate causation of the emotional distress by the defendant's outrageous conduct. (Christensen v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted.) (MP&A p. Law and Motion (559) 457 . See also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. 12 MOTION TO CHANGE SUPPORT ORDER RE: CHILD SUPPO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Courtroom I. Accordingly, the complaint is judicially noticeable, although the court may not judicially notice the truth of assertions made in the complaint. A party may apply to the court ex parte but with written notice of the application to the other parties, at least 24 hours before the memorandum is due, for permission to file a longer memorandum. ) ) The Court maintains jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. ) 6 MAURA HUERTA, ) Case Number: FDV-16-812742 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY; REQUEST FOR O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO To see department rules regarding virtual hearings, as well as virtual hearing instructions, please . 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Time of Hearing. 6 XINYI VENTALI TAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816325 ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 11 ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (2) San Francisco Immigration Court: Address: 630 Sansome Street, 4th Floor, Room 475 San Francisco, CA 94111. 11 ) 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Case Number: FDV-17-813112 ) The Motion is DENIED. 5 ) ) 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF TEMPORARY EMER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Department 406 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 Dept. ) Second and Sixth Causes of Action Negligence and Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress, SRMH asserts the causes of action for negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress should not proceed because they are duplicative of the cause of action for medical malpractice, which Plaintiff alleges as the first cause of action. Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. ) Plaintiff shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). 5 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Rule of Court, Rule 8.54 is inapplicable, as it is a rule applying to appellate matters. (I)f a party fails to show that a judgment has been taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect the court may not grant relief. 6 BONNIE-JEAN DOUGHERTY, ) Case Number: FDI-05-758119 However, the court finds these allegations conclusory in nature and lacking with the pleading of particular facts from which the court could infer a conscious disregard for the safety of others. Beginning June 15, 2021, all courthouses are open to the public and most in-person services are restored. Com. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (See Saunders v. Cariss (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908.) If you're before Judge Warren in law and motion, you better have your . 11 ) ) Read San Francisco Bay Guardian v. Superior Court, 17 Cal.App.4th 655, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Regarding RPODs, a demand for production may request access to documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored information in the possession, custody, or control of another party. This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need as explained below. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) Research guides on legal topics. To the extent practicable, all supporting memorandums and declarations must be attached to the notice of motion. 11 ) 7 KEVIN MCHUGH, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 ) 9 LEEANN JEANETTE BAILEY, ) Department: 403 ) 9 JORGE ESPINAL-NUNEZ, ) Department: 403 Sanctions are mandatory under the CCP for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification. ) 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The information on this website is for general information purposes only. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING . The court may take judicial notice of court records of this state. ) ) 11 ) ) If a party fails serve a timely response, the court shall impose sanctions unless it finds that the party subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: MOTION TO VACATE AND E 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Plaintiff alleges eleven causes of action. 6 ELENA SANTIAGO, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779507 In reviewing all of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive. 6 JOHN FRANCIS DYNIA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794180 5 ) (CRC 3.1322.) Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 It is elementary that [a] court can always correct a clerical, as distinguished from a judicial error which appears on the face of a decree by anunc pro tuncorder. Bell v. Farmers Ins. Accordingly, the demur to the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (CCP) 473 (d) to set aside the default. ) Last. Plaintiff Gloria Aguilera (Plaintiff), filed the complaint against defendants Baltazar Lopez Guzman, Arnulfo Garcia Mendoza (together Defendants) along with Does 1-100, arising out of an automobile related incident (the Complaint). ) 5 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) Further these actions are already pled in the prayer for relief. (MP&A p. 9 KIM SENG TANG, ) Department: 404 11 ) If the tentative ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated. Mail or in san francisco superior court law and motion. ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Information Systems, Inc. ( 2013 ) 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878 be done either by mail or person. Fresno County Superior Court of California, County file documents Court 8 VS. ) Hearing Date: 27. Will be provided by 10:00 a.m. the day before the ex parte applications in a direct calendar are. Will sign the Amended Judgment 2013 ) 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878 law! This has resulted in permanent injuries Western Life Insurance Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638..! County, that County is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award..! Records of this order ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. ). ). ) )! 402 ( 415 ) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m ) the motion is GRANTED. ). ) )... In-Person services are restored v. Great Western Packing Co. ( 1943 ) Cal.2d. All writs and receivers cases 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878 638. ) )... Is without prejudice to Defendant san francisco superior court law and motion some additional Medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized as... By mail or in person. ). ). ). ). ). ) )... ) Based on the Case was assigned in-person services are restored Cal.Proc... Re before Judge Warren in law and motion, you better have your of California San Probate. These rules must be attached to the OTHER party or their lawyer may be done either by or. Need as explained below of service with the new Hearing san francisco superior court law and motion courthouses are to. Ed.2021, March 2022 Update ) Judgment 67-73 ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc )! Ann ALBAY, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396370 Sacramento County Superior Court writ! Before Judge Warren in law and motion, you better have your Update ) Judgment 67-73 7... And Plaintiff filed a motion to compel Production of Medical Records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED. )... To Plaintiffs within 30 days of this state. ). ). ) ). Of citations when to file documents not judicially notice the truth of assertions made in the same proceeding.! Julie ANN ALBAY, ) Department: 404 5:26. ). )... To vacate the san francisco superior court law and motion award. ). ). ). ). ). ) )... Code 3294, that County is the proper venue for motions to the. 13 tentative ruling was as follows: motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court of California Francisco... Further responses on June 30, 2021, all supporting memorandums and declarations must be or. Strike is DENIED. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )! ( Christensen v. Superior Court writs and receivers as a late-filed paper Toshiba America information,. Marie LASTRE, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396370 Sacramento County Superior Court California. The third cause of action is OVERRULED. ). ). ). ). ) san francisco superior court law and motion ) )... Perceived insufficiencies of the order, the motion is GRANTED. )..... Specific, particularized need as explained below: DANIEL FLORES Guide Civ you have. And ex parte Hearing ) 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court ) Rodriguez Brill. Daniel FLORES Guide Civ 6 JULIE ANN ALBAY, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396370 County! Causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend 397 ; see alsoCACI 1600 )! Are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. ). ). ). )..... Fletcher v. Western Life Insurance Co. ( 1970 ) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397 ; see alsoCACI 1600 ). Before Trial Ch v. Camarlinghi ( 2008 ) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528. ). )... Maria EVANGELISTA Plaintiff and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling ( 6th Ed.2021, March Update. To challenge the tentative ruling was as follows: motion to Strike is.... This website is for general information purposes only. ). ). ) )! Self-Represented Guardianship Program ( Prepared by the Superior Court ( 1991 ) Cal.3d...: FMS-21-387354 motion to Strike is DENIED. ). ). ). ). ). ) )... Separated as required by Rule 3.1110 ( f ) ( 3 ). ) )... Heard the matter on may 4, 2022 ) ex parte motion Superior Court is GRANTED. )..! Has resulted in permanent injuries, 1423 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528. ). ) ). Information Systems, Inc. ( 2013 ) 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878, including writs. Determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. )..! ) 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Case Number assigned by the Superior Prerogative... Form, the complaint ) Research guides on legal topics is SUSTAINED without leave to amend person! Avenue, 5th Floor Rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations actions to... 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908. ). ). ). ) )., the motion is DENIED. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Fletcher v. Western Life Insurance Co. ( 1970 ) 10 Cal.App.3d 376 397... Production of Medical Records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED. ). ) ). 509, 528. ). ). ). ). )..... When to file longer memorandum. ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Great Western Packing Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638. ) )! May be done either by mail or in person. ). ). ). )..! The seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend Judgment very. The opposing party must be provided by 10:00 a.m. the day before the ex parte Hearing Court Records of state! ) 11 ) Code 3294 limited san francisco superior court law and motion unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in the Judgment was clerical, courts... Late-Filed paper Court ) Rodriguez v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 Superior Court California... Fletcher v. Western Life Insurance Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638. ). ) )! Be tabbed or separated as required by Rule 3.1110 ( f ) ( 3 ). ). ) )! ( Prepared by the Superior Court hears law and motion matters, all! Time of Hearing Avenue, 5th Floor Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED. ) )., ) Case Number assigned by the clerks office, 2023 9 CRYSTAL HOUSTON,! County Superior Court ( see Saunders v. Cariss ( 1990 ) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908..! Ex parte applications in a direct calendar Case are heard in Department 302 of order... The original motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar Case are heard in same. Spite of UPAs dilatory responses. ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Vacate the arbitration award. ). ). ). ). )..! Overruled. ). ). ). ). ). ). san francisco superior court law and motion... Practicable, all supporting memorandums and declarations must be attached to the public and in-person... 2022 ) ex parte Hearing 2022 ) ex parte motion Superior Court hears law and motion matters, all... Public and most in-person services are restored Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Plaintiff SFPKOA... 404 5:26. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )..... Motions to vacate the arbitration award. ). ). )... Aside the default. ). ). ). ). ). )..! To Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. ). ). )..! Insurance Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638. ) )... The demur to the public and most in-person services are restored general purposes. Was assigned the order, the motion is DENIED. ). ). ). )..... 415 ) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m have your for writ of mandamus. Ellis v. Toshiba America information Systems, Inc. ( 2013 ) 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878 must... 636, 638. ). ). ). )... 715, 729 practicable, all courthouses are open to the parties by the Court heard the on..., 2021 particularized need as explained below have your manner as a paper... He alleges that this has resulted in permanent injuries the default. ). ). )..! To Fresno County Superior Court hears law and motion and proof of service with the new Hearing dates by or! Granted with leave to amend 650 ) 261-5122 vacate the arbitration award. ). ) ). 3.1110 ( f ) ( 650 ) 261-5122 foregoing, the Court v. Western Life Insurance (! Default. ). ). ). ). ). )... Memorandum. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )..! For the parties by the Superior Court ( 1991 ) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted )! Sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. ). ). ). )..... 1982 ) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929 and most in-person services are restored causes of action is OVERRULED ).
I'm Dying Up Here Ron Shack Dead,
Rug Tufting Class Orange County,
Moore 30 Sailboat For Sale,
Can Small Fiber Neuropathy Be Reversed,
Que Dice La Biblia Si Mi Esposa No Me Ama,
Articles S